With the conference officially in full swing today, there was quite a lot going on. This morning I attended program A-4: Social Media and Your Library: Strategies to Lead the Way. This was a great panel discussion on the types of social media law libraries are using, both internally and externally, and it also identified some tools that can aid in social media management. The panelists, Jennifer Murray of Maricopa County Superior Court’s Law Library, Kathleen Brown, of Oklahoma City University’s Law Library, and Steven Lastres of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP discussed their experiences with social media, providing a great look at how different types of law libraries use and manage social media in different ways. (Ex: Twitter as a competitive intelligence tool?!? Fascinating!)
A great takeaway from this program was the importance of putting in place a social media policy and strategy (and making sure the two are aligned). While myriad emerging technologies exist that libraries could be playing with, you don’t want to dive into something just because it’s there: as with any library service, there should be a purpose behind the technologies you choose, and having a social media policy and strategy in place will help you determine what tools are best for your library. As the resident “tweeter” and Facebook manager for our library, I can tell you how time-consuming social media can be. You have to remember that it’s a service of your library; once it’s established, you need to maintain it, and this will take time. This program was excellent for anyone thinking of diving into social media or even for those of us already in the thick of it. If you didn’t have a chance to go, I would recommend accessing the slides from AALL2Go.
The other major programming event I “attended” today was our own! B-8: State Constitutions: Current Historical, and How They Change was held at 2 o’clock today in front of a fairly crowded room. I want to thank everyone who attended our program this afternoon, as well as my co-presenters, Jennifer Morgan and Cindy Dabney, and our moderator, Michelle Cosby. I was so pleased with the turnout for our program; we have worked on it for quite a long time and were so glad to share it with our colleagues today. I would also like to thank the GD-SIS for sponsoring our program.
For those of you who were unable to attend, our program discussed the challenges of state constitutional research. While there are many finding aids on researching the U.S. Constitution, state constitutions can be more challenging, especially if you’re asked to research a state with which you are unfamiliar: there is no uniform method of state constitutional amendment, and different states produce and preserve different documentation along the way, which can be a struggle for researchers. Our program, therefore, identified tools and documents to look for when researching the current or historical texts of state constitutions, or when researching amendment and revision processes within a state. The program culminated by us revealing a 50-State research guide Jennifer created from research she and I compiled on state constitutions.
If you would like materials from our program, the handout is presently available on AALL2GO and at the print stations at the conference; our slides will be posted shortly.
With our program complete, I am looking forward to a restful sleep before a very busy day tomorrow. I hope you’re all enjoying the conference!